Main Features - June 2008


World Bank Meeting: Measuring the Impact of Youth Voluntary Service Programs
By Charmagne Campbell-Patton, ICP Program Associate
Contributing Author: Minna Mattero, World Bank, Child and Youth Development Consultant

Innovations in Civic Participation and the World Bank recently partnered to host an international experts meeting on measuring the impact of youth voluntary service programs. The meeting, held on May 8-9, 2008 at the World Bank headquarters in Washington, DC, brought together over 50 researchers, policymakers, and practitioners from the fields of civic engagement, youth development, and impact evaluation to examine existing evidence on the impact of voluntary service on the program participants, explore different evaluation methods and challenges, identify gaps in the research, and develop a research agenda to address these gaps.

This meeting came about through the work that ICP has been doing to promote youth service as a strategy for global youth and community development. Through various initiatives and forums, ICP and other partner organizations have been working to develop an expanding research base and global network of policymakers, practitioners, and researchers involved in youth service. As part of this effort, ICP and the World Bank's Children and Youth Unit have developed a working relationship around the topic, including co-authoring a World Bank Youth Development Note on  Youth Service: A Strategy for Youth and National Development.

The World Bank's World Development Report (WDR) 2007: Development and the Next Generation, included youth civic service as an example of a "promising but unproven" intervention for positive youth development. This was the first WDR to focus entirely on young people and has become a benchmark for interest on youth issues, including youth service, within the development field. While authors of the report found some evidence of the positive effects of youth service on youth and community development, interdisciplinary quantitative and qualitative evaluations of youth service programs that consider multiple impacts and stakeholders and are comparable across varying program contexts are very limited, particularly in developing countries, which lack of funding and research capacity. Since the publication of the WDR, ICP and the World Bank's Children and Youth unit have continued to work together to more closely examine the evidence base for the impact of youth service programs in order to determine whether there is sufficient evidence for the World Bank to support investments in these types of programs in the context of developing countries.

The May meeting was designed to bring together key experts in the field to look more closely at the evidence base as well as challenges facing the field in building this evidence base. The meeting was very successful and initiated an important dialogue among a diverse group of stakeholders about specific areas in which the field of youth service should focus in order to grow and strengthen.  There was rich dialogue among participants about standards of evidence and appropriate methods for evaluating youth service programs. It became evident during the event that many youth service programs are not at a stage where a quantitative impact evaluation using control groups is appropriate or feasible.

At the conclusion of the meeting, it was clear that there is significant demand for more research in this field. At the moment, the theoretical framework behind youth service needs to be better articulated. Furthermore, given the diversity of programs in the area, the participants recognized the need to develop a common understanding of the terminology surrounding youth service and develop a typology of youth service programs to create a clearer picture of what program options are available. Participants also agreed that more work needs to be done on identifying the expected outcomes and indicators for programs and determining the program models that seem to be most effective in meeting certain objectives. Developing guidelines about the context and development stage in which a program would benefit from an impact evaluation was also considered useful.

To accomplish this task, participants agreed to create a community of practice that could set research norms and principles for high quality youth service programs. To better define the relationship between the community of practice and the World Bank, the conference organizers asked the participants to reflect on what could be the World Bank's role vis a vis the community of practice. ICP will be putting a working group together in the next few weeks to begin the process of defining a strategy for the community of practice, including suggestions for the Bank's role.

A full report based on the proceedings of the meeting will be compiled and made available on the ICP and World Bank websites shortly. For more information about the meeting proceedings, including a complete agenda, speaker biographies, and presentations, please visit http://www.icicp.org/ht/d/sp/i/2628/pid/2628.

 

Powered by Orchid Suites
Orchid ver. 4.7.5.